Stars lose to error.

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!

Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

[MS]

On 2008-05-02 21:52:51 -0700, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!"

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

That's all right. the Sharks had a goal that should have counted last game.

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

Post by MS
On 2008-05-02 21:52:51 -0700, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!"

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

That's all right. the Sharks had a goal that should have counted last game.

The game they won. So you agree the series should be over. Agreed.

[Keith Keller]

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.sports.hockey.nhl.sj-sharks.]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
The game they won. So you agree the series should be over. Agreed.

I agree that your trolling of the Sharks group should be over. (And I'm
not even a Sharks fan.)

--keith

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

Post by Keith Keller
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.sports.hockey.nhl.sj-sharks.]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
The game they won. So you agree the series should be over. Agreed.

I agree that your trolling of the Sharks group should be over. (And I'm
not even a Sharks fan.)

Every unfavorable comment is considered "trolling" by those who cannot
handle civil debate. I will add you to the list of people who cannot handle
civil debate.

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

It has nothing to do with favorable or unfavorable. Your original
crosspost was pretty clearly an attempt to start a flamewar between the
two newsgroups. Your ignoring my Followup-To: header could have been
your braindead newsreader, or your braindead user, or a further attempt
to start a flamewar. Either way, you're trolling. If you want to
attempt a civil debate, keep it in one group, or use less inflammatory
language.

You are a silly, silly, man. The topic was posted to two team's groups that
are playing each other in the playoffs.

The message was "Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be
over now!

Oh well, life is not fair. =-( "

You call that inflammatory? Me thinks you are being a silly ass. PLONK

[Mr. T]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!

Post by MS
On 2008-05-02 21:52:51 -0700, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!"

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

That's all right. the Sharks had a goal that should have counted last game.

The game they won. So you agree the series should be over. Agreed.

Nope, game 3 was the game a goal was taken away from SJ, and a gift 5
on 3 goal was given to Dallas. That was a 1 goal game.

[richk]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

On the Canadian broadcast (TSN), 2 of 3 announcers announcers thought it was
kicked in. All 3 agreed that Morrow hit Nabakoff's leg while stand in the
paint, so the correct call was really no goal and a penalty to Morrow.

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

Post by richk

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

On the Canadian broadcast (TSN), 2 of 3 announcers announcers thought it
was kicked in. All 3 agreed that Morrow hit Nabakoff's leg while stand in
the paint, so the correct call was really no goal and a penalty to Morrow.

Morrows head was up and away from the puck from the time it left the stick
and hit his skate. Unless Morrow knew the pass was coming to him and timed
it perfectly without looking at the puck or the person who passed it, then
that was a neat trick.

[Keith Keller]

["Followup-To:" header set, *again*, to alt.sports.hockey.nhl.sj-sharks.]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows head was up and away from the puck from the time it left the stick
and hit his skate. Unless Morrow knew the pass was coming to him and timed
it perfectly without looking at the puck or the person who passed it, then
that was a neat trick.

Read the rulebook, Rule 49.2. Intent is not necessary to waive off
a goal; only a distinct kicking motion is required.

--keith

[Mr. T]

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

I think the Stars' name should be inscribed on the alternate Cup, the
one for teams that should have won had the refs properly called their
games. There's only a select few thousand teams on that Cup, my friend.

[nJb]

On Sun, 4 May 2008 17:47:02 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. T"

Post by Mr. T

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

I think the Stars' name should be inscribed on the alternate Cup, the
one for teams that should have won had the refs properly called their
games. There's only a select few thousand teams on that Cup, my friend.

Buffalo comes to mind.

Jack

[Don't Taze Me, Bro!]

Post by nJb
On Sun, 4 May 2008 17:47:02 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. T"

Post by Mr. T

Post by Don't Taze Me, Bro!
Morrows goal should have counted. Shame! Series should be over now!
Oh well, life is not fair. =-(

I think the Stars' name should be inscribed on the alternate Cup, the
one for teams that should have won had the refs properly called their
games. There's only a select few thousand teams on that Cup, my friend.

Buffalo comes to mind.
Jack

Not necessarily... despite the fact that crease rule no longer exist, the
goal should not have counted. However, we do not know who would have won
that game or the next...